Archive — US — techcrunch
A federal judge sides with Anthropic in lawsuit over training AI on bookswithout authors’ permission
A federal judge ruled that Anthropic's AI training on books without authors' permission falls under fair use, marking a significant legal precedent. This contrasts with ongoing lawsuits from authors against various tech firms. While the ruling is a win for tech companies, the court will further investigate Anthropic's acquisition of copyrighted works, including those allegedly sourced illegally.
Key points
- Judge William Alsup ruled Anthropic's AI training on books is fair use.
- First court ruling supporting AI companies' fair use claims, impacting creative sectors.
- Authors and publishers have been suing tech firms but face uphill battles.
- Fair use doctrine, last updated in 1976, is crucial in these lawsuits.
- The ruling raises questions about the legality of Anthropic's creation of a 'central library' for books.
- Future trial will assess the legality of pirated books used for training.
Why it matters
- The fair use doctrine has not been significantly revised in decades despite the rise of digital media.
- Technology's influence on copyright law presents challenges for traditional creative industries.
- This ruling reflects broader trends in 2025 where AI technologies intertwine increasingly with creative rights issues.
The ruling by Judge Alsup establishes a pivotal precedent in AI and copyright law, favoring tech companies, but crucial legal battles remain, particularly concerning copyright violations linked to pirated content.