I Didn't Instruct the Generative AI Images That Finely — What I Value in Image Correction - Quadro Diary Generative AI Past Diary

The blogger defends his AI images

The writer makes pictures with generative AI for a diary story. Readers have criticized the hair, head shape, and eyebrows. The writer says he did not ask for those details. He says the AI added them by itself, so it is unfair to judge them as if he planned them.

How he makes and fixes the images

He gives the AI a prompt that describes the general look, such as the face mood, eyes, uniform, height, and background. The AI then fills in everything else. He uses photo-style images because his story is photo-style. He does light touch-ups, like softening skin texture that looks too strong. If the problem is too big, he changes the prompt and generates the image again.

Key facts from the article

• He does not pay for a monthly AI photo-fixing app that costs 2,000 yen.
• The image he discusses was made one year ago.
• He says he would rather spend money on learning advanced Photoshop AI tools for useful work.
• One useful example he gives is fixing a stern face in a memorial photo so it looks calm.

Why this matters

The story shows a common issue with AI art. People often think the creator controlled every detail, but AI adds many choices on its own. The writer also points out that critics are very active when judging others' work but quiet when asked for their own opinion.

What to watch

• Whether the writer changes his prompts to get more natural skin and fewer odd details.
• Whether he takes on paid photo-fixing work that uses AI tools like Photoshop.
• How readers respond when he asks them for their own opinions on his images.