EXPLORINEER
en

US — TechCrunch

Trajectory raises $45M to make AI model training accessible to nontechnical experts

AI1 min read

Trajectory is a 1-year-old startup that raised $45 million to help businesses teach AI models to get better at specialized jobs. Its tool lets people who are not engineers improve AI models using feedback.

What happened

Trajectory, a startup founded about a year ago by three Stanford classmates, announced a $45 million Series A funding round. The round was led by Sequoia and valued the company at $300 million. Its platform is now publicly available. It helps businesses use feedback to keep improving AI models that are built for special fields like law and finance.

Key numbers and facts

  • $45 million raised in a Series A round
  • $300 million valuation
  • 18 employees
  • Investors include Sequoia, Nvidia, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Bain Capital Ventures
  • Customers include Harvey, Rogo, Decagon, Mercor, and Nvidia

Why AI models need extra training

Today's AI models, such as those from OpenAI and Anthropic, do not learn from their mistakes unless they are trained again. Companies that want AI for jobs like law or finance usually change a general model to fit their needs. This is called fine-tuning. Doing it often means hiring a research team or paying expensive consultants, known as forward-deployed engineers (FDEs).

Why it matters

Trajectory wants to make this work faster and cheaper. Its co-founder compares a standard AI model to a very smart student who is always starting a new job. Trajectory aims to let AI keep learning on the job, like a worker with 30 years of experience. If it works, more companies could build useful AI for special tasks without large expert teams. The company also says keeping humans involved makes its method safer than AI that improves itself without checks.

What to watch

  • How many businesses start using the public platform
  • Whether non-technical experts, such as lawyers and doctors, can improve models on their own
  • How Trajectory competes with Thinking Machines Lab, Applied Compute, and Prime Intellect
  • Whether customers like Harvey and Rogo see clear gains in their AI tools

Glossary

Trajectory
A startup that helps businesses keep improving AI models by using feedback to retrain them.
fine-tuning
Extra training that adjusts a general AI model so it works better on one special task.
forward-deployed engineers (FDEs)
Expert consultants who work inside a client's company to set up and adapt technology.
Thinking Machines Lab
A company founded by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati that makes Tinker, a fine-tuning platform.

Ad

Add 150 words. Learn 10 a day.

Dicter word books send only the words you learn to your review notes.

AIITmedia

Anthropic Amends IPO Filing: Q3 Revenue Near $17 Billion, Infrastructure Commitments About $895.4 Billion

Anthropic filed an amended registration statement (Form S-1/A) with the U.S. SEC on November 2 for its planned IPO, adding third-quarter 2026 results and future spending commitments for AI compute and infrastructure. Revenue for July–September was $16.956 billion, up about 47% from the previous quarter, but the company posted an operating loss of $567 million. The total infrastructure commitments of about $895.4 billion include roughly $213.8 billion that can be canceled under pre-start conditions, so the full amount is not unconditional debt.

AIThe Register

AI could break legal systems by finding previously hidden loopholes

Stanford Law School visiting fellow Felix Ringe and collaborator Linus Folkerts argue that large language models have become capable enough to find exploitable inconsistencies in written law at scale, much as they can find vulnerabilities in code. They cite several potential gaps in German law they uncovered with LLM help, while noting they are sharing only exploits they believe could not cause serious harm. The researchers warn that cheap automated legal reasoning could jeopardize the functioning of legal systems, and suggest lawmakers may need to harden legislation, possibly by using advanced AI themselves.

AIArs Technica

Most of our measures of a key cognitive process don't agree

A study published in Nature found that several methods used to measure cognitive reappraisal, a key emotional ability behind cognitive behavioral therapy, do not appear to measure the same thing. The researchers examined trait questionnaires, task-based affective ratings, and amygdala down-regulation during reappraisal, which are often assumed to reflect related aspects of the same capacity. The results suggest there is no reliable way yet to measure the impact of this concept.

AIheise online

Claude Code: Anthropic Tightens Rules Against Game Clones

Anthropic has added two new instructions for its Opus 5.5 model to stop Claude Code from replicating specific existing games, amid criticism of AI-generated game copies. Original games inspired by known genres or based on users' own designs and materials remain allowed. Developers also report that Claude Code has refused work on their own projects, including game mechanics, anti-cheat software and reverse engineering, and it is unclear whether these cases are related to the new rule.