Archive — US — techcrunch
Law professors side with authors battling Meta in AI copyright case
Copyright law professors have filed an amicus brief supporting authors in a lawsuit against Meta, claiming the company's AI training using copyrighted e-books violates intellectual property rights. They argue Meta's fair use defense is overly broad, as the training purpose is commercial and competes directly with the original works. The case, Kadrey v. Meta, has advanced in court amidst wider scrutiny of AI copyright issues.
Key points
- A group of law professors filed an amicus brief supporting authors in Kadrey v. Meta, arguing against Meta's use of copyrighted material for AI training.
- Meta's defense of fair use is challenged as excessively broad by the professors in their brief.
- The training of AI models on copyrighted works is claimed to not be transformative, as it competes with the original works in the market.
- Plaintiffs include notable authors accusing Meta of copyright infringement, claiming Meta removed copyright information to obscure the violations.
- U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria has allowed the case to proceed, recognizing the authors' standing and sufficiency of their claims against Meta.
Why it matters
- This case adds to ongoing debates about copyright in the context of AI technology, reflecting concerns over intellectual property protections in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
- With significant AI copyright lawsuits like The New York Times' case against OpenAI also underway, the legal system is grappling with the implications of AI on creative rights.
- The case is part of a broader trend in 2025's IT landscape, where the intersection of copyright law and AI technology is increasingly scrutinized, prompting discussions on necessary legal reforms.
The case against Meta is a critical moment for copyright law concerning AI, potentially reshaping legal boundaries around the use of creative works in machine learning and highlighting the need for updated regulations in the digital age.