Grammarly’s ‘expert review’ is just missing the actual experts

Grammarly's new 'Expert Review' feature, launched in August 2025, claims to provide writing feedback from renowned authors and journalists. However, it lacks actual endorsements from these figures, only referencing their publicly available works. Users express disappointment over the misleading nature of this feature, questioning its validity as it doesn't involve real experts providing reviews.

Key Points

• Grammarly launched 'Expert Review' in August 2025, aiming to enhance writing through AI-powered suggestions.
• The feature references well-known authors and journalists, but does not involve their actual input or endorsement.
• Users have expressed disappointment, with critics questioning the authenticity of the feedback provided.
• Grammarly stated these references are based on publicly available works and not direct affiliations.

Relevance

• The rise of AI in writing tools reflects broader trends in the tech industry focusing on automation and efficiency.
• Concerns about ethical use of public figures' names echo ongoing debates about AI accountability and the ownership of intellectual content.

The 'Expert Review' feature highlights the tension between leveraging well-known figures for credibility and the ethical implications of doing so without their consent, underscoring the need for transparency in AI applications within writing tools.