Archive — US — techcrunch
Meta takes aim at ex-employee’s memoir ‘Careless People’
Meta recently won a legal ruling against former employee Sarah Wynn-Williams, who published a memoir titled 'Careless People.' An arbitrator found that she may have violated a non-disparagement agreement, temporarily prohibiting her from promoting the book. Despite this, it remains a bestseller, while the publisher claims they will continue to support it, criticizing Meta's tactics to silence authors.
Key points
- Meta won arbitration against Sarah Wynn-Williams for her memoir 'Careless People', suggesting she violated a non-disparagement agreement.
- Wynn-Williams is temporarily restricted from promoting or distributing her book until arbitration concludes.
- Despite the ruling, the book remains a bestseller, potentially benefiting from increased publicity due to the controversy.
- The publisher, Macmillan, defends the book, asserting it underwent thorough editing and condemns Meta's attempts to silence the author.
- Wynn-Williams includes claims in her memoir regarding Facebook's operations in China and personal experiences, such as alleged harassment.
- Meta refutes the memoir's claims, labeling them outdated and false, while denying current plans to operate in China.
- Criticism from former colleagues suggests a divide in perceptions of the memoir's truthfulness.
Why it matters
- This case reflects a growing trend of legal actions surrounding non-disparagement clauses in employment contracts.
- Concerns over censorship and free speech are increasingly pertinent in the tech industry, with similar themes explored in past whistleblower cases.
- The rise of the 'Streisand Effect' illustrates how attempts to suppress information can backfire, a trend observed in other high-profile cases.
The legal showdown between Meta and Wynn-Williams highlights issues of corporate secrecy, employee rights, and public discourse, illustrating the complexities of free speech in the tech industry's evolving landscape.