Archive — US — techcrunch
Microsoft exec called AI scraping ‘the largest theft of labor in human history,’new unredacted filings reveal
Unredacted filings in The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft reveal that AI scraping is considered 'the largest theft of labor in human history.' A Microsoft executive admitted that their AI training practices were akin to theft, posing risks to publications. The companies potentially bypassed paywalls, raising questions about copyright infringement and fair use, exacerbated by claims of market harm to original content sources.
Key points
- A Microsoft executive claimed AI scraping constitutes theft of labor.
- OpenAI's leadership acknowledged their AI models pose an existential threat to publishers.
- The lawsuit, ongoing for three years, questions the legality of AI firms using copyrighted material for training.
- Microsoft's own data suggests a drastic drop in click-through rates for The New York Times due to their products.
- Internal documents indicate that generative AI poses risks to journalist employment and threatens economic foundations of content creators.
- OpenAI allegedly scraped content without consent, bypassed paywalls, and stripped copyright notices from training data.
Why it matters
- This concern over AI scraping aligns with increasing scrutiny on automation's impact on employment.
- The debate on copyright and fair use in the context of AI can impact the legal landscape for tech companies and media outlets.
- Current trends in IT advocate for ethical AI development and the preservation of intellectual property rights.
The revelations from the lawsuit underscore significant challenges regarding AI practices, copyright infringement, and the ethical implications of AI's impact on content creators and the media landscape. The ongoing legal battles may redefine the boundaries of fair use in the age of AI.