Archive — US — techcrunch
Meta settles UK ‘right to object to ad-tracking’ lawsuit by agreeing not totrack plaintiff
Meta has settled a lawsuit in the UK, agreeing not to track human rights campaigner Tanya O’Carroll for targeted ads. This settlement recognizes her legal right to object to data use under UK and EU privacy laws, although Meta maintains its ads aren't direct marketing. The outcome is seen as a potential precedent for others seeking to protect their privacy against similar practices.
Key points
- Tanya O’Carroll challenged Meta in 2022 over targeted advertising practices, claiming her right to object to data usage under UK/EU law.
- Meta argued that its personalized ads do not count as direct marketing, but agreed to the settlement to avoid court.
- The settlement prevents Meta from using O’Carroll's data for ad targeting, reinforcing the legal right to object.
- O’Carroll views the settlement as a bittersweet victory, establishing a precedent for privacy rights but not legally binding Meta's practices.
- The ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) intervened in support of O’Carroll, indicating potential backing for others objecting to data processing.
Why it matters
- The settlement reflects ongoing issues regarding data privacy and the effectiveness of GDPR since its enforcement in May 2018.
- Similar legal actions against tech companies are becoming more common as individuals and regulators push back against surveillance-based advertising.
- Meta's potential shift to a 'pay or consent' model in the UK indicates a broader trend across the tech industry aimed at complying with privacy regulations while maintaining revenue.
The outcome of this case underscores the growing importance of data privacy rights and could empower more consumers to challenge corporate data practices, though the exact legal implications remain unclear.