Archive — US — techcrunch
Tesla could have avoided that $242.5M Autopilot verdict, filings show
Tesla rejected a $60 million settlement offer before a jury awarded $242.5 million over its role in a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot system. The jury found Tesla partly liable for the crash that killed Neima Benavides Leon and severely injured Dillon Angulo, assigning one-third of the blame to Tesla. Tesla plans to appeal the verdict, citing legal errors.
Key points
- In May 2023, Tesla rejected a $60 million settlement offer related to a lawsuit filed in 2021 over a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system.
- The crash occurred when a Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged failed to stop at an intersection, resulting in one death and severe injury.
- A jury in federal court in Miami found Tesla one-third responsible for the crash, assigning two-thirds of the blame to the driver, who was not part of this case's lawsuit.
- The jury awarded $242.5 million in damages, prompting Tesla to announce plans to appeal based on claimed legal errors in the trial.
Why it matters
- This case highlights ongoing debates around the safety and legal accountability of autonomous vehicle technologies, a major issue in the automotive industry.
- Tesla's refusal to settle could signal a shift in how tech firms approach liability and litigation in the face of emerging self-driving technologies.
- The outcome of this case could influence future legislation and regulations regarding the use of autonomous driving systems in the U.S.
Tesla's significant legal challenge after rejecting a settlement reflects broader tensions in the autonomous vehicle sector, potentially shaping future legal frameworks and corporate strategies around self-driving technology.