Archive — US — techcrunch
Government censorship comes to Bluesky, but not its third-party apps … yet
Bluesky has begun censoring content by blocking 72 accounts in Turkey at the government's request, raising concerns among users about its openness. While third-party apps built on Bluesky's infrastructure currently don't have to implement similar censorship, there are worries about future government demands on these apps. This situation reflects broader tensions around social media freedom and government oversight.
Key points
- 1. Bluesky blocked access to 72 accounts in Turkey due to government requests, citing national security.
- 2. Turkish users, who migrated from X (formerly Twitter) to escape censorship, express concerns about Bluesky's decentralization claims.
- 3. Third-party apps are not currently required to enforce these moderation rules, allowing users potential workarounds to bypass censorship.
- 4. App developers have yet to integrate geographic labelers to enforce regional moderation, resulting in fewer restrictions on their platforms.
- 5. Concerns exist that popular third-party applications may become targets for government censorship in the future.
Why it matters
- This censorship incident highlights ongoing global issues related to social media regulation and freedom of expression.
- The trend of governments requesting content removal from social media platforms is increasing, influencing the design and operation of these services.
- The discussion around Bluesky's moderation practices aligns with similar debates around the use of moderation and censorship on platforms like Twitter and Mastodon.
The recent government censorship on Bluesky illustrates significant challenges to user freedom on social media, raising critical questions about future regulatory pressures on both centralized and decentralized platforms.